Development and refinement of a communication guide to help young adults in Texas reconnect and reduce loneliness.

Objective: Loneliness among young people is a contemporary public health crisis exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The present research examined the development of a modest yet meaningful health communication intervention resource that would become an asset in a larger health campaign: a communication guide aimed at helping young people reach out and reconnect with others. Methods: Study One established the need for a loneliness intervention in Texas with survey data (N = 795). A communication guide was developed based on research and theory. Study Two employed focus group interviews with potential audience members (N = 31) to critically assess and inform revisions to the communication guide. Results: Study One results indicated that a substantial proportion of young adult Texans felt as though their social connection had decreased and their loneliness had increased since the onset of the pandemic. Themes in focus group responses from Study Two suggested several strengths of the communication guide and some opportunities for revision. Conclusion: A communication guide with tips for reconnecting could be a valuable tool to empower young people and promote social connection. Innovation: This study involved the development and refinement of a new communication resource that was informed by a priority audience of a major health communication campaign.

A Reasoned Action Approach to Social Connection and Mental Health: Racial Group Differences and Similarities in Attitudes, Norms, and Intentions.

This study employed a Reasoned Action Approach to investigate two communication behaviors that were being built into a statewide behavioral health campaign: initiating a conversation about one's own mental health struggles, and starting a conversation to discuss someone else's mental health difficulties. We examined whether the extent of attitudes, perceived norms, and perceived behavioral control regarding intent to perform these behaviors varied by racial identity. Using original survey data from Texans (N = 2,033), we conducted regression analyses for the two communication behaviors and found that intention to seek help was primarily explained by instrumental attitude, injunctive norm, descriptive norm, and perceived capacity; and intention to start a conversation to help someone else was primarily explained by instrumental attitude, injunctive norm, and perceived capacity. Additionally, we identified important common and distinct determinants of the two behaviors across different racial groups. Implications for health communication campaign message development and audience segmentation are discussed.

Chaplain reported plans for end-of-life care conversations: Role clarity for the spiritual care specialists.

The present study examined chaplain reported plans for patient conversations regarding end-of-life (EOL) care through the lens of multiple goals. Chaplains (n = 69) were asked to curate a plan for engaging with a patient about EOL treatment options, including how they would engage in the conversation and what they would plan to discuss. Findings indicated that plans primarily consisted of relational and identity goals, with a majority navigating multiple goal orientations. Content overwhelmingly involved developing rapport with patients, eliciting patient preferences for care, and serving as a patient liaison. The current study addresses the paucity of research around the role a chaplain plays on the interdisciplinary team and their respective approach to EOL conversations. Examination of curated plans affords insight to what content is prioritized and which conversational goals are present. Integration of multiple goals offers preliminary evidence for conversational quality. Awareness of goal approach and content prioritized affords clarity on how chaplains can be called upon to support members of the interdisciplinary care team.

A Multiple Goals Approach to Exploring Social Worker Conversational Plans for Advance Care Treatment with Terminally Ill Patients.

Social workers play an integral role in end-of-life planning and patient outcomes, and yet how social workers approach such conversations with patients is not well understood. The current study employed a cross-sectional design to examine social worker planned communication about end-of-life care using a multiple goals framework. Recruited from online listservs, a content analysis was conducted with social worker curated plans (n = 20) for end-of-life conversations. Plans were coded for topics and content alignment with instrumental, identity, and relational goal types. Topics found were related to eliciting patient goals and the utilization of written resources. A substantial percentage of social workers also noted the inclusion of other parties in the conversation. Findings suggested that content was predominately instrumental (i.e. task-oriented) with an overwhelming majority adhering to multiple conversational goals. Plan content affords insight to occupational orientation and prioritization during conversations with patients. Further, identifying how the majority of planned responses integrate multiple goals simultaneously gives credence to existing research regarding enhanced conversational effectiveness when social workers are present on the palliative care team.

Health-Care Provider Planned Responses to Patient Misunderstandings about End-of-Life Care.

This study examined health-care provider planned responses to patient misunderstandings about end-of-life care using a multiple goals framework. Plan topics and content alignment with task, identity, and relational goal types were coded. Findings suggested that content was predominately task-oriented and concerned implications of treatment options such as choice outcomes and efficacy rates. A substantial percentage of providers planned to refer further discussion about the misunderstanding to another team member or occupational resource. Despite the prompt of patient misunderstanding, little attention was given to literacy and/or avoidance of medical jargon. Implications for these findings are discussed.